Links Contact Us


Thursday, November 30, 2006

NORTH CAROLINA -- CHANGE YOUR DRIVERS LICENSE LAW.......NOW.

Man charged in driving deaths apparently in U.S.illegally with N.C.license-Marine back from Iraq

Information from: The (Baltimore) Sun (via Observer) ^ Associated Press

A man charged with manslaughter in the drunken-driving deaths of two people was apparently in the U.S. illegally and had obtained a driver's license in North Carolina, according to immigration officials.

Eduardo Raul Morales-Soriano, 25, of Laurel, has been charged with two counts of homicide by motor vehicle in the deaths of Marine Cpl. Brian Mathews, 21, of Columbia, and Jennifer Bower, 24, of Montgomery Village.

Mathews and Bower, who were on their second date, were killed on Thanksgiving when Morales-Soriano allegedly slammed into the back of their car. Mathews had recently finished eight months of duty in Iraq and planned to leave the military in June.

Morales-Soriano, who police said had a blood-alcohol level four times the legal limit for driving, was not injured in the crash. He was being held in the Howard County Detention Center on $830,000 bail.

There was no record of Morales-Soriano, a Mexican citizen who worked as a landscaper, entering the U.S. legally, said James Dinkins, acting special agent in charge of the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Office in Baltimore.
(Excerpt) Read more at fayobserver.com ...

Activist judges run amok...

http://citizenoutreachblog.com/?p=328
DC Confidential - November 29, 2006 -->
By Chuck Muth

OH, FOR CRYING OUT LOUD

A federal judge has ruled that the fact that blind people can’t see means the federal government is “discriminating” against them by not printing paper money in such a way that blind folks can tell which denominations are which without looking at them, despite the existence of electronic devices which help the blind do just that.

Government officials argued that changing the sizes and/or textures of different bills would make it harder to combat counterfeiting, not to mention the cost taxpayers would incur to make such a change. But U.S. District Court Judge James Robertson wasn’t having any of it, ruling that our Georgie Washingtons and Al Hamiltons today are in violation of the Rehabilitation Act, whatever the hell THAT is.

In a true shocker, Judge Robertson was appointed by President Bill Clinton in 1994.
In unrelated news, another federal judge ruled yesterday that President Bush doesn’t have the authority to call a terrorist group a terrorist group and block their assets. In so ruling, U.S. District Judge Audrey Collins removed yet another weapon from the president’s arsenal in the war against terrorists.

Guess which president appointed Judge Collins in 1994?

THIS is why judicial appointments below the Supreme Court level are SO important. And THIS why the Republican-controlled Senate should hang its head in shame for not filling all the vacant lower-court seats currently open when they had their chance over the past two years.

God help the refugees of publik skools.

http://www.usatoday.com/life/people/2006-11-21-lindsay-statement_x.htm

Lindsay Lohan released a statement Tuesday extending her condolences to Robert Altman's family:
"I would like to send my condolences out to Catherine Altman, Robert Altmans wife, as well as all of his immediate family, close friends, co-workers, and all of his inner circle.
"I feel as if I've just had the wind knocked out of me and my heart aches.
"If not only my heart but the heart of Mr. Altman's wife and family and many fellow actors/artists that admire him for his work and love him for making people laugh whenever and however he could..
"Robert altman made dreams possible for many independent aspiring filmmakers, as well as creating roles for countless actors.
"I am lucky enough to of been able to work with Robert Altman amongst the other greats on a film that I can genuinely say created a turning point in my career.
"I learned so much from Altman and he was the closest thing to my father and grandfather that I really do believe I've had in several years.
"The point is, he made a difference.
"He left us with a legend that all of us have the ability to do.
"So every day when you wake up.
"Look in the mirror and thank god for every second you have and cherish all moments.
"The fighting, the anger, the drama is tedious.
"Please just take each moment day by day and consider yourself lucky to breathe and feel at all and smile. Be thankful.
"Life comes once, doesn't 'keep coming back' and we all take such advantage of what we have.
"When we shouldn't..... '
"Make a searching and fearless moral inventory of yourselves' (12st book) -everytime there's a triumph in the world a million souls hafta be trampled on.-altman Its true. But treasure each triumph as they come.
"If I can do anything for those who are in a very hard time right now, as I'm one of them with hearing this news, please take advantage of the fact that I'm just a phone call away.
God Bless, peace and love always.
Thank You,
"BE ADEQUITE"
Lindsay Lohan

Wednesday, November 29, 2006

Wishful thinking, Chuck.

(Daily Politics ^ )It just goes to show you how little the Dems understood Reagan conservatives to begin with. If they truly believe what they have witnessed since Reagan was Reagan conservatism, they never got it in the first place.

I guess Chucky was out of the media for 24 hours or something to provoke this silly outburst. Dangerous place to be in DC....between Chuck and a TV camera. Man, does he love to hear himself bloviate.

John Corzine said it best:
“Sharing a media market with Chuck Schumer is like sharing a banana with a monkey. Take a little bite of it, and he will throw his own feces at you.”

Friday, November 17, 2006

Milton Friedman, RIP

www.patriotpost.us

MILTON FRIEDMAN
In the near-half century of the Cold War, the fields of battletook many forms. There were the diplomatic battlefields, suchas Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev's shoe-pounding "we will bury you" tirade before the United Nations, and U.S. Ambassador Adlai Stevenson's brilliant demonstration of the existence of Soviet missiles in Cuba before that same body.

There were the cultural battlefields, where the likes of Jane Fonda and John Kerry demonstrated their contempt for the cause of freedom, evengoing so far as to meet with Communist North Vietnamese officialsin wartime, in Hanoi and Paris, respectively.

There were also the"hot" battlefields of the Cold War---from Korea to Central Africa and from Vietnam to Central America, to name a few. Then there was the battlefield of ideas. Here, Milton Friedman stood as a giant among men, defending the cause of liberty against the totalitarian ideologies of Marxism, Communism and Socialism.

Milton Friedman, American patriot, "Chicago School" economist, Nobel Laureate and advisor to presidents, died yesterday at the age of 94. He is survived by his wife, fellow economist andfrequent co-author Rose, and their son David, also a ChicagoSchool economist. With Dr. Friedman's passing, the free world loses one of its greatest-ever intellectual warriors.

Friedman is, of course, best known for his articulationof and apologia for free-market economics---a system he considered a fundamental necessity of man's existence as a free,self-determinative individual. No lightweight in his field, these ideas won Friedman the Nobel Prize for Economics in 1976.

Workingin the shadow of Roosevelt's New Deal and Johnson's Great Society,at a time when the country was wrestling with its soul, Friedman's reinvigoration of free-market ideals was a godsend. At a time when that half of the world which subsisted behind the Iron Curtain longed to be free, America itself seemed content to follow what fellow economist Friedrich von Hayek called "The Road to Serfdom."

America's apparent willingness to become a modern welfare state on the model of her European counterparts,complete with endless entitlements and soft socialism, was just that---slavery to the state. Rather, as the title of one of Friedman's classic works states, Americans must be "Free to Choose," for "Capitalism and Freedom"are inextricably bound. "Many people want the government to protect the consumer," Friedman said. "A much more urgent problem is toprotect the consumer from the government."

Speaking of the need for free markets for freedom, Friedman argued that "the tide of ideas isn't local. It's international; it's worldwide."

Indeed, his influence has been felt worldwide. Friedman's "Chicago Boys" provided economic leadership in countries around the globe: Thatcher's Great Britain, Chile,the Czech Republic, Portugal, South Korea and Spain, to name a few.

By enacting Friedman's free-market ideas---hammering inflation, reducing trade barriers, inducing foreign investment and cutting public spending---these economies went from dormancyto dynamism within a matter of years.

Let's not forget, of course, Friedman's prescient advocacy for then-unheard-of ideas like the flat tax, market deregulation and school choice. Then there's the "Friedman Test," a statistical masterpiece that still reverberates in the world of economic theory.

According to Martin Anderson, chief domestic-policy advisor to Ronald Reagan, Friedman's footprint on the history of ideas is sizeable. "If you step back and look at all the sweeping political and economic changes in the United States and even in other countries, a lot of people have had an important effect,"says Anderson, "but if you had to name one person who had themost impact, it's Milton Friedman."

Before the influence of free-market ideas had reached so far, Friedman joined von Hayek, his University of Chicago colleague, in the founding of the Mont Pelerin Society in 1947. Comprising a handful of woefully outnumbered but like minded individuals,the Society became known as a "kind of Comintern for the free-market."

In 1967, the spring season of the American welfare state, Friedman's election as president of the American Economic Association stood in stark contrast. In 1980, Friedman found a broader venue for his ideas, with themonumental debut of his "Free to Choose" series on PBS, where, asthe Heritage Foundation's Ed Feulner puts it, he made "a compellingcase to millions of viewers on the essential connection between capitalism and human freedom."

In 1988 Ronald Reagan awarded Dr. Friedman the Presidential Medal of Freedom. It is hard to imagine a more deserving recipient. Renowned by friends and enemies alike as an indefatigable debater, Friedman was not without his lighter side. When Richard Nixon famously remarked, "We are all Keynesians now," Friedman wrote to friend and Keynesian economist John Kenneth Galbraith: "You must be as chagrined as I am to have Nixon for your disciple."

On another occasion, when hiring an administrative assistant concerned over her lack of training in economics, Friedman didn't miss a beat: "You don't have to worry about not knowing anything about economics. There are many people who studied economics foryears and don't know anything about economics. Stick with me and you'll learn the correct way."

That good-spiritedness, however, never kept Friedman from making his point with powerful effect. When Nixon enacted wage-and-pricecontrols in 1971, Friedman penned a scathing assessment in the opinion pages of the New York Times: "The controls are deeply and inherently immoral. By substituting the rule of men for ther ule of law and for voluntary cooperation in the marketplace,the controls threaten the very foundations of a free society. By encouraging men to spy and report on one another, by making it in the private interest of large numbers of citizens to evade controls, and by making actions illegal that are in the public interest, the controls undermine individual morality."

It is worth noting that Friedman's 1976 Nobel Prize---the pinnacle of his life's work---fell on the 200th anniversary of both Thomas Jefferson's Declaration of Independence and Adam Smith's"The Wealth of Nations."

This is altogether fitting, since Milton Friedman embodied the inextricable link between personal liberty and economic liberty that these two seminal works have come to represent. As we say a fond farewell to one of the free world's great champions, let us hope that America continues to be blessed with men of such moral and intellectual courage.

Thursday, November 16, 2006

So she has a uterus. Big whoop.

I have never understood the leftist obsession with physical (e.g. racial or gender) characteristics as a reason for obtaining a job. The fact that Nancy Pelosi is a chick should not even be mentioned. It is a true insult that it is pointed out as if it is some kind of miracle that she was elected Speaker of the House.

What the heck difference does it make what genetic traits we possess when compared to merit? She worked hard. So have other Speakers to make it to that position. You've come a long way, baby? Not when it has to be mentioned breathlessly at every turn.

And by the way. Where were the breathless reports of a "first" when Condi Rice became the first black woman to become Secretary of State? (Read Coulter's excellent column: Desperate Congresswomen of Hysteria Lane) Or when Miguel Estrada would have been the first Hispanic on the DC Circuit Ct. of Appeals? The list is endless of firsts, but it would seem the the media only pants in excitement when it is a leftist "first."

When I went to an all girls' college prep school, there was never any mention of the newfound "girl power" philosophy. Our sense of self didn't come from our gender, but from our God given talents and brain power. I never thought for a moment that "I couldn't" because I was female (or vice versa)....only that I might not have the aptitude, or the patience, or I didn't enjoy it or whatever quality I might be lacking. I never thought I was more powerful or less so because I was a female. Not once. And being female has never hindered me, either.

The extraordinary teachings of the church of the liberal, which emphasizes racial and gender differences is instructing a generation of children to be hyper-conscious of these things rather than what really counts -- character, merit, integrity, effort, values and all of those qualities that are completely color and gender neutral. It breaks my heart that children are taught to rely upon qualities that should not make one bit of difference in success, hiring or achievement rather than the true substance of each human being.

Have you ever seen children playing? Different races and genders? They could care less about race or gender. They have to be taught to notice those things. What matters to kids is whether or not their friends are fun, play fair and like to do similar things. Emphasis on racial/gender differences are going to continue to widen the gulf.

I'm interested in what Pelosi is going to do when it comes time to wield the gavel or punch in her voting card, not the fact that she sits down during potty time. The fact that she is probably one of the most extreme leftists ever to take possession of the gavel has little or nothing to do with her gender, but her radical philosophy.

And as she awakens to the notion that not everyone everywhere in America would like to reflect San Francisco values...and as her agenda is rejected, rebuked or fails miserably with time and circumstance, my advice to the nation is to hang on....it is going to be a bumpy ride.

Hubris, thy name is Schumer.

The Battle for the Judiciary

Combat boots? Never going to have a 5-4 majority?

For someone who has never worn combat boots a day in his life and counsels everyone to be "bipartisan" and "moderate", his tone in the article falls way short of his expectations of others.

Wednesday, November 15, 2006

RENOMINATED! Let's see what our Senators plan to do with these....fight or flee?

IN CASE YOU MISSED IT…

The following re-nominations were delivered to the U.S. Senate this afternoon:

Terrence W. Boyle, of North Carolina, to be United States Circuit Judge for the Fourth Circuit, vice J. Dickson Phillips, Jr., retired.

William James Haynes II, of Virginia, to be United States Circuit Judge for the Fourth Circuit, vice H. Emory Widener, Jr., retiring.

Michael Brunson Wallace, of Mississippi, to be United States Circuit Judge for the Fifth Circuit, vice Charles W. Pickering, Sr., retired.

William Gerry Myers III, of Idaho, to be United States Circuit Judge for the Ninth Circuit, vice Thomas G. Nelson, retired.

Norman Randy Smith, of Idaho, to be United States Circuit Judge for the Ninth Circuit, vice Stephen S. Trott, retired.

Peter D. Keisler, of Maryland, to be United States Circuit Judge for the District of Columbia Circuit, vice John G. Roberts, elevated.


Also, the following nominations are expected to be delivered to the U.S. Senate this afternoon:

James Edward Rogan, of California, to be United States District Judge for the Central District of California, vice Nora M. Manella, resigned.

Benjamin Hale Settle, of Washington, to be United States District Judge for the Western District of Washington, vice Franklin D. Burgess, retired.

Margaret A. Ryan, of Virginia, to be Judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, vice H.F. “Sparky” Gierke, term expired.

Scott Wallace Stucky, of Maryland, to be Judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, vice Susan J. Crawford, term expired.

Monday, November 13, 2006

SHORT honeymoon....

Two huge mistakes that Speaker Pelosi could come to regret, no matter how it is being spun:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/11/12/AR2006111200762_pf.html

AND

http://www.rollcall.com/issues/1_1/breakingnews/15974-1.html

Can you even IMAGINE Alcee Hastings, the former judge who was IMPEACHED, taking over the House Intelligence Committee? Frankly, I have no idea what he is even doing in Congress, muchless on the Intelligence committee.

Can you imagine the howls from the Congressional Black Caucus if he is passed over by Pelosi?

And the whole "Let's endorse cut-and-run Murtha over Steny Hoyer for Leader" flap is truly monumental. Taking sides in a primary is usually a huge no-no for elected officials. This shows without a doubt that Pelosi is pretty beholden to the liberal left. Not surprising, but still....one would think that she'd keep that mask going at least until some contentious bill comes up.

But nope, she's stepped in it right off the bat.

Who knows, it might be a good thing that Pelosi and her run-and-hide liberal friends want to pull out of Iraq. Since the terrorists are departing Afghanistan in a state of glee over the Dems election to the majority in DC, it would appear that we are going to need all hands on deck from the military here at home.....where we are apparently going to be fighting the War on Terror.

Thanks, Nancy & crew.....for putting my family at risk with your 1960s, idiotic, kum-by-a, give peace a chance, tie-dyed, completely deranged view of the War on Terror. Giving in to terrorist demands and leaving the front lines only emboldens and empowers them, you nitwits.

Friday, November 10, 2006

Just give peace a chance....lalalalala...lalalala

Well this should be enlightening. A little trip back into the time of love beads, tie-dye and retreat. Gosh, I wonder if Bob Dylan will show up for a little peace song sing-a-long.

We are so doomed.

Taking their cues from the 9th Circus...

Students at Calif. College ban Pledge of Allegiance
LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - Student leaders at a California college have touched off a furor by banning the Pledge of Allegiance at their meetings, saying they see no reason to publicly swear loyalty to God and the U.S. government.The move by Orange Coast College student trustees, the latest clash over patriotism and religion in American schools, has infuriated some of their classmates -- prompting one young woman to loudly recite the pledge in front of the board on Wednesday night in defiance of the rule."America is the one thing I'm passionate about and I can't let them take that away from me," 18-year-old political science major Christine Zoldos told Reuters."The fact that they have enough power to ban one of the most valued traditions in America is just horrible," Zoldos said, adding she would attend every board meeting to salute the flag.http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20061110/us_nm/life_pledge_d...

Thursday, November 09, 2006

Thank the Dems for the filibuster? I think not.

There are some complete dolts out there in the Democrat spin machine who are actually claiming that Republicans should be cheering the fact that they stopped the nuclear option.

First of all, they didn't stop it, idiotic republicans stopped it. Second, getting rid of the filibuster of judicial nominations was just that -- only getting rid of the filibuster as it applied to judicial nominations. There was never a consideration of getting rid of the filibuster as a legislative tool.

The idea that the GOP was ever going to use a filibuster on a judicial nomination was ludicrous and I seriously doubt that they currently have the cajones to use a filibuster on anything else, either. Whoever thinks this caucus just got more gutsy, raise their hands.

But no, the leftists are content to exist with whatever information the MSM hand feeds them.

Let the obstruction begin!!!!

I've heard that Sen. Leahy is already spreading the news that President Clinton only had 1 appeals court nominee confirmed in his last two years. (Maybe he was too busy with the intern pool to nominate anyone....)

Unfortunately, Sen. Leahy's creative mathematics are as accurate as ever! Fact is, President Clinton had 15 of his appeals court nominees confirmed in the last two years of his Administration -- in divided government. Not to mention the 57 district court nominees confirmed.

Here is some info on the subject:

-- Carter had 154 district court nominees and 44 appeals court nominees confirmed in the last two years...in divided government.

-- Bush had 41 had 100 district court nominees and 20 appeals court nominees confirmed in the last two years....in divided government.

-- Reagan had 66 district court nominees and 17 appeals court nominees confirmed in the last two years...in divided government.

-- The average number of appeals court nominees confirmed in the last two years in non-divided government is 24. District court nominees....94.25.

-- The average number of appeals court nominees in divided government is 17. District court nominees confirmed...74.

Clearly, Senator Leahy and his minions are already looking for the excuse to obstruct.

Wednesday, November 08, 2006

The party of bean counters......

“First woman to serve as speaker of the house: Nancy Pelosi, First Muslim elected to U.S. Congress: Keith Ellison, First democratic socialist elected to U.S. Congress: Bernie Sanders, First Jewish governor of New York: Eliot Spitzer, First African-American governor of Massachusetts: Deval Patrick, And, according to the Gay and Lesbian Victory Fund, 67 openly gay candidates were elected to state and local offices.” [Worth Repeating]

Let's just count how many of each collective were elected, why don't we? Silliness. Pure silliness. Who the heck truly cares that the Speaker of the House now sits down to pee? This is the race-conscious, class and gender conscious Bravo Sierra that we are going to have to endure for the next few years.

They didn't seem nearly as concerned about race when they were deploying character assasination against Miguel Estrada, who would have been the first Hispanic on the DC Circuit Ct of Appeals. Or Condi Rice as the first black female Sec. of State. Or any number of nominees, judicial or otherwise. In fact, they were downright nasty about them simply because they didn't tow the leftist mantra.

And so the fun begins. There will never be a shortage of material with the antics of these clowns in power.

The Silence of the Left on recounts and Diebold is DEAFENING.

November 8, 2006
HISTORIC VICTORY FOR DIEBOLD
By Ann Coulter Legal Affairs Correspondent, Human Events
History was made this week! For the first time in four election cycles, Democrats are not attacking the Diebold Corp. the day after the election, accusing it of rigging its voting machines. I guess Diebold has finally been vindicated.So the left won the House and also Nicaragua. They've had a good week. At least they don't have their finger on the atom bomb yet. Continued...
Read the rest of Ann's article here

Interesting numbers to note

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: NOVEMBER 8, 2006

CWA’S Crouse: Slight, but Significant Voter Changes
Dashed GOP Hopes for Election 2006

Washington, D.C. ––– In a dramatic shift of allegiance, two voting blocs abandoned the Republican Party in yesterday’s election. (1) Married Mothers and Married Men were decisive factors for the Republicans in 2000 and in 2004, but in the mid-term elections of 2006 they were as likely to vote Democratic as Republican. (2) Evangelical support of Republican candidates dropped from 74 percent in 2004 to 69 percent in 2006.

Dr. Janice Shaw Crouse, Director and Senior Fellow of CWA’s Beverly LaHaye Institute, said, “Married Mothers and Married Men –– the M & Ms –– are very concerned about issues affecting their families, especially issues related to their children’s well-being and future. Families had such high hopes when conservatives were in power; they ended up discouraged, disappointed and disillusioned.”

Crouse said, “In terms of how groups voted, there were slight, but very significant changes from 2002 to 2006 that spelled disaster for the GOP.
More Republicans voted for Democrats (9 percent), than Democrats voted for Republicans (6 percent).
More conservatives voted for Democrats (21 percent), than liberals voted for Republicans (10 percent).

Nearly 30 percent (29 percent) of White Evangelicals voted for Democrats and 54 percent of those who attend church weekly voted for Democrats.
Among voters who thought that the scandals were “extremely important,” 53 percent voted Democrat.

“Though roughly the same percentage of evangelicals voted in 2006 as voted in 2002 (24 and 25 percent), there was a 2 percentage point drop in conservatives who voted (34 percent in 2002 compared with 32 percent in 2006). Also, there was an increase in the percentage of liberals who voted; in 2002, 17 percent of voters identified themselves as liberal compared to 21 percent in 2006.

“Finally,” concluded Crouse, “pessimistic voters dominated this election. More than half of the voters (56 percent) said that the country is on the wrong track, nearly six in ten voters said that they disapprove of the way President Bush is handling his job (down from 2004), and 61 percent of voters disapprove of the Republican-controlled Congress.”

Concerned Women for America (CWA) is the nation’s largest public policy women’s organization.
--30--

Some post-election post-mortem

Not unexpected, frankly. Many of us were out there screaming at
the top of our lungs about running on an issue that united all Republicans --
judicial nominations. Worked quite well in 2002 and 2004 and for whatever
reason, it was abandoned in 2006, on the verge of what could be the most
important nomination to the SCOTUS in our lifetimes. Foolish.

Spending like drunken sailors certainly didn't help and further abandonment
of conservative principles added fuel to the disenchantment of economic and
social conservatives alike. Face it, my conservative brethren -- we were ALL
disappointed and frustrated at the complete lack of motivation to champion
conservative ideas despite having majorities in both houses and the Presidency.
So sure, the most diehard of us voted, but it wasn't enthusiastic.

But notice something interesting here -- Several marriage amendments passed.
The Michigan Civil Rights Initiative passed. An "English Only" initiative passed.
And the Democrats that won? They ran as conservative, blue dog democrats.
They didn't win, folks. We lost, badly, because they took up the conservative
mantra that Republicans had abandoned.

Just like Bill Bennett said in 1996 or so...."We were so afraid of standing for
something and losing that we stood for nothing and lost anyways." Boldness has its
cost to be sure, but it also has its benefits -- like folks know definitively where you
stand.

Unlike the wailing and gnashing of teeth that rebounded through leftists
communities after the thrashings of 2000, 2002 and 2004, I actually feel more
determined and dedicated than ever. I can't look into the eyes of my children
and say, "all is lost, so let's give up!" And with a precious baby girl on the way, I
will hardly show her that the first lesson in life is to give up when things get tough.

No, no, no. Lick your wounds if you must, fellow conservatives, but resist the
temptation to form a circular firing squad.

We lost. It happens. Toughen up. Daylight is burning....and there is much, much
work to do.

Let's roll.

How proud Senator Nelson must be.

Bill Nelson's son pepper sprayed, arrested in Orlando
BY ERIKA BERAS

It started as a good night for the Nelsons. Bill Nelson, the Democratic
senator from Florida, easily beat his opponent, Katherine Harris.
But while his father got a second six-year term in Washington, Nelson's
adult son got a face full of pepper spray and a trip to jail. Charles William
Nelson, 30, of Rockledge was arrested by Orlando police.

The charges: battery on a law officer, disorderly intoxication and resisting
arrest without violence. ... Remaining behind were Charles Nelson, a
second unidentified man and a woman who appeared to have passed out.

According to the police report, the responding officer asked if the woman,
Kimberly Baxter, was all right.

''She is fine,'' Nelson replied. ''I'll take her to the hotel.''

Nelson appeared intoxicated, the report says. The police officer radioed
for an ambulance to check on the condition of Baxter. Nelson insisted she
was fine, the report says, picked her up and began to ''drag'' her away.
The officer told Nelson to halt. He dropped the woman, the report says,
nearly hitting her head on the base plate of a traffic control device.

Leftists may have won tonight. But the fight is long from being over.

"We shall have no truce or parley with you, or the grisly gang who work your wicked will. You do your worst, and we will do our best....We do not expect to hit without being hit back, and we intend with every week that passes to hit harder. Prepare yourselves then, my friends and comrades, for this renewal of your exertions. We shall never turn from our purpose, however sombre the road, however grievous the cost, because we know that out of this time of trial and tribulation will be born a new freedom and glory for all mankind." - Winston Churchill, 1941

Thursday, November 02, 2006

Seymour Hersh is one sick puppy.

An excerpt from his recent diatribe against the war, Bush, etc:

If Americans knew the full extent of U.S. criminal conduct, they would receive returning Iraqi veterans as they did Vietnam veterans, Hersh said.

“In Vietnam, our soldiers came back and they were reviled as baby killers, in shame and humiliation,” he said. “It isn’t happening now, but I will tell you – there has never been an [American] army as violent and murderous as our army has been in Iraq.”

BOO! Scary...

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=17771

Judiciary
Halloween Scare: Harry and Nancy Send Chills Through Conservatives
by Kay R. DalyPosted Oct 31, 2006

Imagine it is 2007. Imagine further that the leftists’ hopes and dreams for the decimation of the GOP congressional majorities has happened.

Can you see the beehive of activity that ensues?

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D.-Calif.) and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D.-Nev.) are presiding over their new committee chairmen who are busily attempting to dismantle anything that has the faint aroma of the GOP agenda.

Financial Services Chairman Barney Frank (D.-Mass.) is holding hearings to roll back the tax cuts that have driven the unheralded economic boom of late and spends his nights making lists of endless new taxes to collect from anything bigger than a breadbox, dead or alive.

International Relations Chairman Tom Lantos (D.-Calif.) creates a nice gift basket for North Korean dictator Kim Jong Il with autographs from Hollywood stars, plenty of spicy photos and a note that says, “Let’s chat.”

Intelligence Chairman Alcee Hastings (D.-Fla.) is defunding any and all intelligence agencies. Meanwhile, Judiciary Chairman John Conyers (D.-Mich.), in conjunction with Government Reform Chairman Henry Waxman (D.-Calif.), is building his impeachment case and drawing up subpoenas for everyone with an “R” behind their name.

Subcommittee Chairman Dennis Kucinich is designing his new bureaucratic boondoggle, the “Department of Peace.”

On the Senate side, Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Chairman Teddy Kennedy (D.-Mass.) is liberating all labor unions from any financial reporting whatsoever and reviving the Hillary plan to nationalize healthcare. Kennedy has also dropped a bill to grant citizenship to anyone who puts a toe on American soil, disband the Border Patrol and demand that every form of communication be translated into 24 languages.

Appropriations Chairman Robert Byrd (D.-W.Va.) is in hog’s heaven, renaming every department, agency and staple gun after himself and moving it to West Virginia.

Environment and Public Works Chairwoman Barbara Boxer (D.-Calif.) is working tirelessly against new drilling or building new refineries anywhere on the North American continent and we all are mandated to ride bicycles while holding our breath to stop the looming global warming disaster.

Small Business and Entrepreneurship Chairman John Kerry (D.-Mass.) is supporting entrepreneurial activities by introducing a subsidy for his pet program “Marry for Money” and letting entrepreneurial tax collectors, regulators and trial lawyers loose on any successful small business owners.

Armed Services Chairman Carl Levin (D.-Mich.) is crafting legislation to bring all troops home and have them each personally issue an apology to the “freedom fighters” in Iraq and Afghanistan.

And then, the call comes that Judiciary Chairman Pat Leahy (D.-Vt.) has been waiting for. The news tickers explode with the headline that a new vacancy on the Supreme Court has just opened.

Normally, the advice and consent process would kick in and the President of the United States would make his choice to fill the Supreme Court vacancy.

But this is a brave new world in 2007, and the previous demands from the left to dictate the choice of a judicial nomination have now become the rule.

Senators Teddy Kennedy, Chuck Schumer, Dianne Feinstein and Dick Durbin crowd a podium in front of the fawning press to describe their “ideal” nominee. The word of the day is “mainstream,” which in liberal-speak is defined as a nominee who agrees with them. The reality is that Kennedy could not find the definition of the word “mainstream” unless it had a flashing neon “open bar” sign on it.

Doesn’t matter, however, because “advice and consent” has now become “demand or destroy.” In other words, the President, held hostage by a Senate controlled by hostile extremists, must bow to the leftists’ collectivist whims. If the President does not capitulate to their demands, the nominee, no matter how qualified, brilliant or fair, will be destroyed simply because he hasn’t passed the Kennedy/Schumer/Durbin ideological litmus test.

Leading the charge, and many senators by the nose, will be the well-funded, merry band of extremist puppeteers to include Ralph Neas, Medea Benjamin, Kim Gandy, Nan Aron, George Soros, Howard Dean and the new socialist in the caucus, Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont.

If any of this brings bile to your throat, please realize that this is not a drill. It could be our reality on Nov. 8, 2006. Voting has never been more important given that the Supreme Court literally hangs in the balance. Every issue that we conservatives care about—from the War on Terror to immigration, from gay marriage to property rights—either starts or ends in courthouses across the nation. Any legislative or ballot initiative could end up in a courtroom where one black-robed judge can, with the awesome coercive power of the federal bench and the strike of a pen, overturn whatever good the people’s will has designated.

Therefore, it truly matters who wields the gavel and whether or not they are judicial activists or judges who will apply the law as it is written, not as they would like it to be. It also matters who is doing the confirming and the obstructing.

Senators such as Rick Santorum (R.-Pa.) led the Senate, sometimes kicking and screaming, to do their duty and confirm judges. He spent countless hours on the floor of the Senate defending nominees from withering, baseless, cruel attacks by the obstructionists on the left. Several other senators in the GOP caucus up for re-election, such as Senators Jim Talent (R.-Mo.), George Allen (R.-Va.), Jon Kyl (R.-Ariz.), Mike DeWine (R.-Ohio) among so many others tirelessly fought for worthy nominees whose reputations were being unfairly savaged for political sport.Re-electing these constitutional warriors is a critical element to stop the leftists bent on escalating the obstruction, particularly if there is another Supreme Court nomination in the next two years that would conceivably shift the balance of the court away from judicial activism and toward restraint.

Judicial nominations are consistently cited as one of the main successes of the past few years. This did not occur in a vacuum without the assistance of several senators dedicated to a fair judiciary. And it certainly did not happen under the auspices of a Leahy chairmanship.

Ms. Daly is chairman of the Coalition for a Fair Judiciary and host of www.KayDaly.com