Links Contact Us


Tuesday, January 30, 2007

Now that I know that it bothers them....

Just when you think the Dems can't get anymore petty, petulant and self-involved.....it is truly hard to believe that any ink has been shed over this junk:

*http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/
la-na-democrat30jan30,0,2751671.story?coll=la-home-headlines


I'd like to know when the LA Times is going to spend as much space explaining why every conservative mentioned in a story is "ultra-conservative" or "extreme" and every liberal is "moderate" or "progressive".

Please. When I was a journalism major, you could not use adjectives (except for "a", "an" or "the") in a story unless you were specifically writing an op-ed. You had to use the word "said", rather than "opined", "complained" or any other verb that conveys any other image that was less than objective. You had to actually learn to do 25 word leads with the five "w's" compactly contained within. Then again, you actually had to learn to write effectively and efficiently.

If you strayed from basic rules of reporting, you were snarled at, failed, and told to report to the feature story class down the hall. Now? Pick up any newspaper and the agendas hit you full in the face. So do the Dems really want to talk about the usage of adjectives?

Republicans have been getting the raw end of THAT deal for decades now.

Too bad journalism isn't taught in J School anymore.

Wednesday, January 24, 2007

References to judicial nominations -- 2001-2007

FYI, the references to judges in GW’s State of the Union Addresses.
2001 – nothing
2002 – nothing
2003 – nothing
2004 – reference related to marriage, not appointments
2005 – substance and process
2006 – substance
2007 – process

References to Judges in President Bush’s State of the Union Addresses


January 24, 2007

A future of hope and opportunity requires a fair, impartial system of justice. The lives of our citizens across our nation are affected by the outcome of cases pending in our federal courts. We have a shared obligation to ensure that the federal courts have enough judges to hear those cases and deliver timely rulings. As President, I have a duty to nominate qualified men and women to vacancies on the federal bench. And the United States Senate has a duty, as well, to give those nominees a fair hearing, and a prompt up-or-down vote on the Senate floor.

January 31, 2006

A hopeful society depends on courts that deliver equal justice under the law. The Supreme Court now has two superb new members -- new members on its bench: Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Sam Alito. (Applause.) I thank the Senate for confirming both of them. I will continue to nominate men and women who understand that judges must be servants of the law, and not legislate from the bench.

February 2, 2005

Because marriage is a sacred institution and the foundation of society, it should not be re-defined by activist judges.

Because courts must always deliver impartial justice, judges have a duty to faithfully interpret the law, not legislate from the bench. (Applause.) As President, I have a constitutional responsibility to nominate men and women who understand the role of courts in our democracy, and are well-qualified to serve on the bench -- and I have done so. (Applause.) The Constitution also gives the Senate a responsibility: Every judicial nominee deserves an up or down vote.

January 20, 2004

Activist judges, however, have begun redefining marriage by court order, without regard for the will of the people and their elected representatives. On an issue of such great consequence, the people's voice must be heard. If judges insist on forcing their arbitrary will upon the people, the only alternative left to the people would be the constitutional process. Our nation must defend the sanctity of marriage.

January 28, 2003
nada

January 29, 2002
nada

February 27, 2001
nada

Tuesday, January 23, 2007

Text of the State of the Union

FULL STATE OF THE UNION SPEECH Tue Jan 23 2007 20:20:50 ET
[EMBARGOED UNTIL DELIVERY ]
Madam Speaker, Vice President Cheney, Members of Congress,
distinguished guests, and fellow citizens:
This rite of custom brings us together at a defining hour –
when decisions are hard and courage is tested. We enter the year
2007 with large endeavors underway, and others that are ours to
begin. In all of this, much is asked of us. We must have the will to
face difficult challenges and determined enemies – and the wisdom
to face them together.

Some in this Chamber are new to the House and Senate –
and I congratulate the Democratic majority. Congress has changed,
but our responsibilities have not. Each of us is guided by our own
convictions – and to these we must stay faithful. Yet we are all
held to the same standards, and called to serve the same good
purposes: To extend this Nation’s prosperity ... to spend the
people’s money wisely ... to solve problems, not leave them to
future generations ... to guard America against all evil, and to keep
faith with those we have sent forth to defend us.

We are not the first to come here with government divided and
uncertainty in the air. Like many before us, we can work through
our differences, and achieve big things for the American people.
citizens don’t much care which side of the aisle we sit on – as long
as we are willing to cross that aisle when there is work to be done.
Our job is to make life better for our fellow Americans, and help them
to build a future of hope and opportunity – and this is the business
before us tonight.

A future of hope and opportunity begins with a growing economy –
and that is what we have. We are now in the 41st month of
uninterrupted job growth – in a recovery that has created 7.2
million new jobs ... so far. Unemployment is low, inflation is low,
and wages are rising. This economy is on the move – and our job
is to keep it that way, not with more government but with
more enterprise. }

Next week, I will deliver a full report on the state of our economy.
Tonight, I want to discuss three economic reforms that deserve to
be priorities for this Congress.

First, we must balance the federal budget. We can do so without
raising taxes. What we need to do is impose spending discipline
in Washington, D.C. We set a goal of cutting the deficit in half by
2009 – and met that goal three years ahead of schedule. Now let
us take the next step. In the coming weeks, I will submit a budget
that eliminates the federal deficit within the next five years. I ask
you to make the same commitment. Together, we can restrain the
spending appetite of the federal government, and balance the
federal budget.

Next, there is the matter of earmarks. These special interest
items are often slipped into bills at the last hour – when not even
C-SPAN is watching. In 2005 alone, the number of earmarks grew
to over 13,000 and totaled nearly $18 billion. Even worse, over
90 percent of earmarks never make it to the floor of the House
and Senate – they are dropped into Committee reports that are
not even part of the bill that arrives on my desk. You did not vote
them into law. I did not sign them into law. Yet they are treated
as if they have the force of law. The time has come to end this practice.
So let us work together to reform the budget process ... expose every
earmark to the light of day and to a vote in Congress … and cut the
number and cost of earmarks at least in half by the end of this session.

Finally, to keep this economy strong we must take on the challenge
of entitlements. Social Security and Medicare and Medicaid are
commitments of conscience – and so it is our duty to keep them
permanently sound. Yet we are failing in that duty – and this
failure will one day leave our children with three bad options:
huge tax increases, huge deficits, or huge and immediate cuts
in benefits. Everyone in this Chamber knows this to be true –
yet somehow we have not found it in ourselves to act. So let us
work together and do it now. With enough good sense and good
will, you and I can fix Medicare and Medicaid – and save Social Security.

Spreading opportunity and hope in America also requires public
schools that give children the knowledge and character they need
in life. Five years ago, we rose above partisan differences to pass
the No Child Left Behind Act – preserving local control, raising
standards in public schools, and holding those schools accountable
for results. And because we acted, students are performing better
in reading and math, and minority students are closing the
achievement gap.

Now the task is to build on this success, without watering down
standards ... without taking control from local communities ...
and without backsliding and calling it reform. We can lift
student achievement even higher by giving local leaders
flexibility to turn around failing schools ... and by giving families
with children stuck in failing schools the right to choose something
better. We must increase funds for students who struggle – and
make sure these children get the special help they need. And we
can make sure our children are prepared for the jobs of the future,
and our country is more competitive, by strengthening math and
science skills. The No Child Left Behind Act has worked for
America’s children – and I ask Congress to reauthorize this good law.

A future of hope and opportunity requires that all our citizens
have affordable and available healthcare. When it comes to
healthcare, government has an obligation to care for the
elderly, the disabled, and poor children. We will meet those
responsibilities. For all other Americans, private health insurance
is the best way to meet their needs. But many Americans cannot
afford a health insurance policy.

Tonight, I propose two new initiatives to help more Americans
afford their own insurance. First, I propose a standard tax
deduction for health insurance that will be like the standard
tax deduction for dependents. Families with health insurance
will pay no income or payroll taxes on $15,000 of their income.
Single Americans with health insurance will pay no income or
payroll taxes on $7,500 of their income. With this reform,
more than 100 million men, women, and children who are
now covered by employer-provided insurance will benefit
from lower tax bills.

At the same time, this reform will level the playing field
for those who do not get health insurance through their job.
For Americans who now purchase health insurance on their
own, my proposal would mean a substantial tax savings –
$4,500 for a family of four making $60,000 a year. And for
the millions of other Americans who have no health insurance
at all, this deduction would help put a basic private health
insurance plan within their reach. Changing the tax code is a
vital and necessary step to making healthcare affordable for
more Americans.

My second proposal is to help the states that are coming up
with innovative ways to cover the uninsured. States that
make basic private health insurance available to all their
citizens should receive federal funds to help them provide
this coverage to the poor and the sick. I have asked the
Secretary of Health and Human Services to work with
Congress to take existing federal funds and use them to
create “Affordable Choices” grants. These grants would
give our Nation’s governors more money and more flexibility
to get private health insurance to those most in need.

There are many other ways that Congress can help. We
need to expand Health Savings Accounts ... help small
businesses through Association Health Plans ... reduce
costs and medical errors with better information technology
... encourage price transparency ... and protect good doctors
from junk lawsuits by passing medical liability reform. And
in all we do, we must remember that the best healthcare
decisions are made not by government and insurance
companies, but by patients and their doctors.

Extending hope and opportunity in our country requires
an immigration system worthy of America – with laws that
are fair and borders that are secure. When laws and borders
are routinely violated, this harms the interests of our country.
To secure our border, we are doubling the size of the Border
Patrol – and funding new infrastructure and technology.

Yet even with all these steps, we cannot fully secure the
border unless we take pressure off the border – and that
requires a temporary worker program. We should establish
a legal and orderly path for foreign workers to enter our
country to work on a temporary basis. As a result, they won’t
have to try to sneak in – and that will leave border agents free
to chase down drug smugglers, and criminals, and terrorists.
We will enforce our immigration laws at the worksite, and give
employers the tools to verify the legal status of their workers –
so there is no excuse left for violating the law. We need to uphold
the great tradition of the melting pot that welcomes and
assimilates new arrivals. And we need to resolve the status of
the illegal immigrants who are already in our country – without
animosity and without amnesty.

Convictions run deep in this Capitol when it comes to immigration.
Let us have a serious, civil, and conclusive debate – so that you
can pass, and I can sign, comprehensive immigration reform into law.

Extending hope and opportunity depends on a stable supply of
energy that keeps America’s economy running and America’s
environment clean. For too long our Nation has been dependent
on foreign oil. And this dependence leaves us more vulnerable
to hostile regimes, and to terrorists – who could cause huge
disruptions of oil shipments ... raise the price of oil ... and do
great harm to our economy.

It is in our vital interest to diversify America’s energy supply –
"and the way forward is through technology. We must continue
changing the way America generates electric power – by even
greater use of clean coal technology ... solar and wind energy ...
and clean, safe nuclear power. We need to press on with battery
research for plug-in and hybrid vehicles, and expand the use of
clean diesel vehicles and biodiesel fuel. We must continue investing in
new methods of producing ethanol – using everything from wood
chips, to grasses, to agricultural wastes.

We have made a lot of progress, thanks to good policies in
Washington and the strong response of the market. Now even
more dramatic advances are within reach. Tonight, I ask
Congress to join me in pursuing a great goal. Let us build on
the work we have done and reduce gasoline usage in the
United States by 20 percent in the next ten years – thereby
cutting our total imports by the equivalent of three-quarters
of all the oil we now import from the Middle East.

To reach this goal, we must increase the supply of alternative
fuels, by setting a mandatory Fuels Standard to require 35
billion gallons of renewable and alternative fuels in 2017 – this
is nearly five times the current target. At the same time, we
need to reform and modernize fuel economy standards for cars
the way we did for light trucks – and conserve up to eight and
a half billion more gallons of gasoline by 2017.

Achieving these ambitious goals will dramatically reduce our
dependence on foreign oil, but will not eliminate it. So as we
continue to diversify our fuel supply, we must also step up
domestic oil production in environmentally sensitive ways.
And to further protect America against severe disruptions to
our oil supply, I ask Congress to double the current capacity
of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve.

America is on the verge of technological breakthroughs that
will enable us to live our lives less dependent on oil. These
technologies will help us become better stewards of the
environment – and they will help us to confront the serious
challenge of global climate change.

A future of hope and opportunity requires a fair, impartial
system of justice. The lives of citizens across our Nation are
affected by the outcome of cases pending in our federal courts.
And we have a shared obligation to ensure that the federal
courts have enough judges to hear those cases and deliver
timely rulings. As President, I have a duty to nominate qualified
men and women to vacancies on the federal bench. And the United
States Senate has a duty as well – to give those nominees a fair
hearing, and a prompt up-or-down vote on the Senate floor.

For all of us in this room, there is no higher responsibility than
to protect the people of this country from danger. Five years
have come and gone since we saw the scenes and felt the sorrow
that terrorists can cause. We have had time to take stock of our
situation. We have added many critical protections to guard
the homeland. We know with certainty that the horrors of that
September morning were just a glimpse of what the terrorists
intend for us – unless we stop them.

With the distance of time, we find ourselves debating the causes
of conflict and the course we have followed. Such debates are
essential when a great democracy faces great questions. Yet one
question has surely been settled – that to win the war on terror
we must take the fight to the enemy.

From the start, America and our allies have protected our
people by staying on the offense. The enemy knows that the
days of comfortable sanctuary, easy movement, steady financing,
and free flowing communications are long over. For the terrorists,
life since Nine-Eleven has never been the same.

Our success in this war is often measured by the things that
did not happen. We cannot know the full extent of the attacks
that we and our allies have prevented – but here is some of
what we do know: We stopped an al Qaeda plot to fly a hijacked
airplane into the tallest building on the West Coast. We broke
up a Southeast Asian terrorist cell grooming operatives for attacks
inside the United States. We uncovered an al Qaeda cell developing
anthrax to be used in attacks against America. And just last August
, British authorities uncovered a plot to blow up passenger planes
bound for America over the Atlantic Ocean. For each life saved,
we owe a debt of gratitude to the brave public servants who devote
their lives to finding the terrorists and stopping them.

Every success against the terrorists is a reminder of the
shoreless ambitions of this enemy. The evil that inspired
and rejoiced in Nine-Eleven is still at work in the world.
And so long as that is the case, America is still a Nation at war.

In the minds of the terrorists, this war began well before
September 11th, and will not end until their radical vision
is fulfilled. And these past five years have given us a much
clearer view of the nature of this enemy. Al Qaeda and its
followers are Sunni extremists, possessed by hatred and
commanded by a harsh and narrow ideology. Take almost
any principle of civilization, and their goal is the opposite.
They preach with threats ... instruct with bullets and bombs
... and promise paradise for the murder of the innocent.

Our enemies are quite explicit about their intentions. They
want to overthrow moderate governments, and establish safe
havens from which to plan and carry out new attacks on our
country. By killing and terrorizing Americans, they want to
force our country to retreat from the world and abandon the
cause of liberty. They would then be free to impose their will
and spread their totalitarian ideology. Listen to this warning
from the late terrorist Zarqawi: “We will sacrifice our blood
and bodies to put an end to your dreams, and what is coming
is even worse.” And Osama bin Laden declared: “Death is
better than living on this Earth with the unbelievers among us.”

These men are not given to idle words, and they are just one
camp in the Islamist radical movement. In recent times, it has
also become clear that we face an escalating danger from Shia
extremists who are just as hostile to America, and are also
determined to dominate the Middle East. Many are known
to take direction from the regime in Iran, which is funding
and arming terrorists like Hezbollah – a group second only
to al Qaeda in the American lives it has taken.

The Shia and Sunni extremists are different faces of the
same totalitarian threat. But whatever slogans they chant,
when they slaughter the innocent, they have the same
wicked purposes. They want to kill Americans ... kill
democracy in the Middle East ... and gain the weapons
to kill on an even more horrific scale.

In the sixth year since our Nation was attacked, I wish
I could report to you that the dangers have ended.
They have not. And so it remains the policy of this
government to use every lawful and proper tool of
intelligence, diplomacy, law enforcement, and military
action to do our duty, to find these enemies, and to
protect the American people.

This war is more than a clash of arms – it is a decisive
ideological struggle, and the security of our Nation is
in the balance. To prevail, we must remove the conditions
that inspire blind hatred, and drove 19 men to get onto
airplanes and come to kill us. What every terrorist fears
most is human freedom – societies where men and
women make their own choices, answer to their own
conscience, and live by their hopes instead of their
resentments. Free people are not drawn to violent and
malignant ideologies – and most will choose a better way
when they are given a chance. So we advance our own
security interests by helping moderates, reformers, and
brave voices for democracy. The great question of our day
is whether America will help men and women in the Middle
East to build free societies and share in the rights of all
humanity. And I say, for the sake of our own security
. . . we must.

In the last two years, we have seen the desire for
liberty in the broader Middle East – and we have
been sobered by the enemy’s fierce reaction. In 2005,
the world watched as the citizens of Lebanon raised the
banner of the Cedar Revolution ... drove out the Syrian
occupiers ... and chose new leaders in free elections. In
2005, the people of Afghanistan defied the terrorists and
elected a democratic legislature. And in 2005, the Iraqi
people held three national elections – choosing a
transitional government ... adopting the most progressive,
democratic constitution in the Arab world … and then
electing a government under that constitution. Despite
endless threats from the killers in their midst, nearly
12 million Iraqi citizens came out to vote in a show of
hope and solidarity we should never forget.

A thinking enemy watched all of these scenes, adjusted
their tactics, and in 2006 they struck back. In Lebanon,
assassins took the life of Pierre Gemayel, a prominent
participant in the Cedar Revolution. And Hezbollah
terrorists, with support from Syria and Iran, sowed
conflict in the region and are seeking to undermine
Lebanon’s legitimately elected government. In Afghanistan,
Taliban and al Qaeda fighters tried to regain power by
regrouping and engaging Afghan and NATO forces. In Iraq,
al Qaeda and other Sunni extremists blew up one of the
most sacred places in Shia Islam – the Golden Mosque
of Samarra. This atrocity, directed at a Muslim house of
prayer, was designed to provoke retaliation from Iraqi
Shia – and it succeeded. Radical Shia elements, some of
whom receive support from Iran, formed death squads.
The result was a tragic escalation of sectarian rage and
reprisal that continues to this day.

This is not the fight we entered in Iraq, but it is the fight
we are in. Every one of us wishes that this war were over
and won. Yet it would not be like us to leave our promises
unkept, our friends abandoned, and our own security at
risk. Ladies and gentlemen: On this day, at this hour, it is
still within our power to shape the outcome of this battle.
So let us find our resolve, and turn events toward victory.

We are carrying out a new strategy in Iraq – a plan that
demands more from Iraq’s elected government, and gives
our forces in Iraq the reinforcements they need to complete
their mission. Our goal is a democratic Iraq that upholds
the rule of law, respects the rights of its people, provides
them security, and is an ally in the war on terror.

In order to make progress toward this goal, the Iraqi
government must stop the sectarian violence in its capital.
But the Iraqis are not yet ready to do this on their own. So
we are deploying reinforcements of more than 20,000
additional soldiers and Marines to Iraq. The vast majority
will go to Baghdad, where they will help Iraqi forces to
clear and secure neighborhoods, and serve as advisers
embedded in Iraqi Army units. With Iraqis in the lead,
our forces will help secure the city by chasing down
terrorists, insurgents, and roaming death squads. And
in Anbar province – where al Qaeda terrorists have
gathered and local forces have begun showing a willingness
to fight them – we are sending an additional 4,000 United
States Marines, with orders to find the terrorists and clear
them out. We did not drive al Qaeda out of their safe haven
in Afghanistan only to let them set up a new safe haven in
a free Iraq.

The people of Iraq want to live in peace, and now is the time
for their government to act. Iraq’s leaders know that our
commitment is not open ended. They have promised to
deploy more of their own troops to secure Baghdad – and
they must do so. They have pledged that they will confront
violent radicals of any faction or political party. They need
to follow through, and lift needless restrictions on Iraqi
and Coalition forces, so these troops can achieve their
mission of bringing security to all of the people of Baghdad.
Iraq’s leaders have committed themselves to a series of
benchmarks to achieve reconciliation – to share oil revenues
among all of Iraq’s citizens ... to put the wealth of Iraq
into the rebuilding of Iraq ... to allow more Iraqis to re-enter
their nation's civic life ... to hold local elections ... and to
take responsibility for security in every Iraqi province.
But for all of this to happen, Baghdad must be secured.
And our plan will help the Iraqi government take back
its capital and make good on its commitments.

My fellow citizens, our military commanders and I have
carefully weighed the options. We discussed every possible
approach. In the end, I chose this course of action because
it provides the best chance of success. Many in this chamber
understand that America must not fail in Iraq – because
you understand that the consequences of failure would be
grievous and far reaching.

If American forces step back before Baghdad is secure,
the Iraqi government would be overrun by extremists
on all sides. We could expect an epic battle between Shia
extremists backed by Iran, and Sunni extremists aided by
al Qaeda and supporters of the old regime. A contagion of
violence could spill out across the country – and in time the
entire region could be drawn into the conflict.

For America, this is a nightmare scenario. For the enemy,
this is the objective. Chaos is their greatest ally in this
struggle. And out of chaos in Iraq, would emerge an
emboldened enemy with new safe havens... new recruits
... new resources ... and an even greater determination to
harm America. To allow this to happen would be to ignore
the lessons of September 11th and invite tragedy. And ladies
and gentlemen, nothing is more important at this moment in
our history than for America to succeed in the Middle East
... to succeed in Iraq ... and to spare the American people
from this danger.

This is where matters stand tonight, in the here and now.
I have spoken with many of you in person. I respect you
and the arguments you have made. We went into this largely
united – in our assumptions, and in our convictions. And whatever
you voted for, you did not vote for failure. Our country is
pursuing a new strategy in Iraq – and I ask you to give it a
chance to work. And I ask you to support our troops in the
field – and those on their way.

The war on terror we fight today is a generational struggle
will continue long after you and I have turned our duties
over to others. That is why it is important to work together
so our Nation can see this great effort through. Both parties
and both branches should work in close consultation. And this
is why I propose to establish a special advisory council on the
war on terror, made up of leaders in Congress from both
political parties. We will share ideas for how to position America
to meet every challenge that confronts us. And we will show
our enemies abroad that we are united in the goal of victory.

One of the first steps we can take together is to add to the
ranks of our military – so that the American Armed Forces
are ready for all the challenges ahead. Tonight I ask the
Congress to authorize an increase in the size of our active
Army and Marine Corps by 92,000 in the next five years.
A second task we can take on together is to design and
establish a volunteer Civilian Reserve Corps. Such a corps
would function much like our military reserve. It would
ease the burden on the Armed Forces by allowing us to
hire civilians with critical skills to serve on missions abroad
when America needs them. And it would give people across
America who do not wear the uniform a chance to serve
in the defining struggle of our time.

Americans can have confidence in the outcome of this
struggle – because we are not in this struggle alone. We have
a diplomatic strategy that is rallying the world to join in the
fight against extremism. In Iraq, multinational forces are
operating under a mandate from the United Nations – and
we are working with Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and the
Gulf States to increase support for Iraq’s government. The
Nations has imposed sanctions on Iran, and made it clear
that the world will not allow the regime in Tehran to acquire
nuclear weapons. With the other members of the Quartet –
the UN, the European Union, and Russia – we are pursuing
diplomacy to help bring peace to the Holy Land, and pursuing
the establishment of a democratic Palestinian state living
side-by-side with Israel in peace and security. In Afghanistan,
NATO has taken the lead in turning back the Taliban and
al Qaeda offensive – the first time the Alliance has deployed
forces outside the North Atlantic area. Together with our
partners in China, Japan, Russia, and South Korea, we are
pursuing intensive diplomacy to achieve a Korean Peninsula
free of nuclear weapons. And we will continue to speak out for
the cause of freedom in places like Cuba, Belarus, and Burma –
and continue to awaken the conscience of the world to save the
people of Darfur.

American foreign policy is more than a matter of war and
diplomacy. Our work in the world is also based on a timeless
truth: To whom much is given, much is required. We hear
the call to take on the challenges of hunger, poverty, and
disease – and that is precisely what America is doing. We
must continue to fight HIV/AIDS, especially on the continent
of Africa – and because you funded our Emergency Plan for
AIDS Relief, the number of people receiving life-saving drugs
has grown from 50,000 to more than 800,000 in three short
years. I ask you to continue funding our efforts to fight HIV/AIDS.
I ask you to provide $1.2 billion over five years so we can
combat malaria in 15 African countries. I ask that you fund
the Millennium Challenge Account, so that American aid
reaches the people who need it, in nations where democracy
is on the rise and corruption is in retreat. And let us continue
to support the expanded trade and debt relief that are the
best hope for lifting lives and eliminating poverty.

When America serves others in this way, we show the
strength and generosity of our country. These deeds
reflect the character of our people. The greatest strength
we have is the heroic kindness, courage, and self sacrifice
of the American people. You see this spirit often if you know
where to look – and tonight we need only look above to
the gallery.

Dikembe Mutombo grew up in Africa, amid great
poverty and disease. He came to Georgetown University
on a scholarship to study medicine – but Coach John
Thompson got a look at Dikembe and had a different
idea. Dikembe became a star in the NBA, and a citizen
of the United States. But he never forgot the land of his
birth – or the duty to share his blessings with others.
He has built a brand new hospital in his hometown. A
friend has said of this good hearted man: “Mutombo
believes that God has given him this opportunity to do
great things.” And we are proud to call this son of the
Congo our fellow American.

After her daughter was born, Julie Aigner-Clark
searched for ways to share her love of music and art
with her child. So she borrowed some equipment, and
began filming children’s videos in her basement. The
Baby Einstein Company was born – and in just five
years her business grew to more than $20 million in
sales. In November 2001, Julie sold Baby Einstein to
the Walt Disney Company, and with her help Baby
Einstein has grown into a $200 million business. Julie
represents the great enterprising spirit of America. And
she is using her success to help others – producing child
safety videos with John Walsh of the National Center for
Missing and Exploited Children. Julie says of her new
project: “I believe it's the most important thing that
ever done. I believe that children have the right to live
in a world that is safe.” We are pleased to welcome this
talented business entrepreneur and generous social
entrepreneur – Julie Aigner-Clark.

Three weeks ago, Wesley Autrey was waiting at a
Harlem subway station with his two little girls, when
he saw a man fall into the path of a train. With seconds
to act, Wesley jumped onto the tracks ... pulled the man
into a space between the rails ... and held him as the train
passed right above their heads. He insists he’s not a hero.
Wesley says: “We got guys and girls overseas dying for us to
have our freedoms. We got to show each other some love.”
There is something wonderful about a country that produces
a brave and humble man like Wesley Autrey.

Tommy Rieman was a teenager pumping gas in Independence,
Kentucky, when he enlisted in the United States Army. In
December 2003, he was on a reconnaissance mission in
when his team came under heavy enemy fire. From his
Humvee, Sergeant Rieman returned fire – and used his
body as a shield to protect his gunner. He was shot in
the chest and arm, and received shrapnel wounds to his
legs – yet he refused medical attention, and stayed in the
fight. He helped to repel a second attack, firing grenades
at the enemy’s position. For his exceptional courage,
Sergeant Rieman was awarded the Silver Star. And like
so many other Americans who have volunteered to defend
, he has earned the respect and gratitude of our whole
country.

In such courage and compassion, ladies and gentlemen,
we see the spirit and character of America – and these
qualities are not in short supply. This is a decent and
honorable country – and resilient, too. We have been
through a lot together. We have met challenges and faced
dangers, and we know that more lie ahead. Yet we can go
forward with confidence – because the State of our Union
is strong ... our cause in the world is right ... and tonight
that cause goes on.

Bauer '08


Friday, January 19, 2007

No spanking? NO WAY.

http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews
/news/politics/16487654.htm?source=rss


The woman who proposed this lunacy isn't even a MOTHER. In the Mercury News article that describes her bill, she admits she took the advice of her veterinarian who told her not to ever strike her cat. Good grief!

Age appropriate spanking, NOT beatings -- but a mere swat on the bottom -- done with calm rather than anger, along with a simple admonition of the offending behavior and an admission from the child about the behavior with remorse does wonders. Spanking becomes less necessary as consequences for misbehavior become clear to the child -- that only happens with consistency and when the parents are in absolute control of their emotions when they administer the discipline.

To say that a one-year old, two-year old or three year old has no comprehension of discipline is to show a complete lack of understanding of children. Limits must be set and set early or the little darlings will take over the house and run their parents into the ground. They will bargain and negotiate and try "time outs" and generally raise kids no one will want to be around.

You see parents hand their children their car keys or wallets in a grocery store to play with and then they wonder why their children scream bloody murder when Mommy needs her wallet or keys and takes them away. They think it is cute that little Johnny gets hold of the remote control to the television then curse the world when little Johnny loses it, hides it or thinks it is now his property. You see parents allow the worst sort of talking back, defiance and general testing of limits....and yet these extremely well-educated, otherwise competent people start negotiating with toddlers like Donald Trump in "The Art of the Deal." And the line of acceptable behavior slips farther and farther out of view.

Pretty soon, parents are prisoners in the home, wanting to go nowhere for fear of their children's behavior -- or worse still, they accept it, chalking it up to "kids will be kids". Today, they are defiant in giving back the remote control, down the road, they will take the car without hesitation or fear.

It is tragic to see the level to which even good conservatives buy into this liberal garbage about child-rearing. Unbelievably tragic for the children, who crave limits, are in their comfort zone with schedules and do far better in a disciplined environment where the rules and lines of acceptable behavior aren't constantly shifting.

My children rarely need what we call "discipline" (spankings) now because they already know if they "do not obey first time..." there will be consequences. All I have to do when we are out someplace is raise an eyebrow and they straighten up right away. And I can take them anywhere and hear rave reviews on their behavior from weary parents who then beg for the secret of how we do it....:)

It is no secret. But here's a hint -- don't listen to childless feminists whose sole experience with child-rearing comes from her veterinarian.

For the fans of "24"

Jack Bauer office management training......:)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Ca2BYqn-FM

God bless all who serve.....

And may He comfort the families of those extraordinary souls, like 2ndLt. Mark Daily.


Irvine soldier killed [Mark Daily Explained Why He Fought in Last Blog Post]
OC Register ^ Jan 18, 2007 Greg Hardesty and Mark Daily

IRVINE – Mark J. Daily's last e-mail to his family was brief.

"All is well," he wrote. "More war stories than I can fit in this e-mail. Having the time of my life!"
The 23-year-old was killed Monday when a bomb ripped through his military vehicle in the northern Iraqi city of Mosul, officials said Wednesday.

Daily had been in Iraq for only three months.

Family and friends of the lifelong Irvine resident took some solace in his final message.

"He sincerely believed in what he was doing and wanted to finish the job and come home," Mark's father, John F. Daily, said in brief comments outside his home Wednesday.
He was too distraught to talk in detail about the Woodbridge High School graduate and the second of his four children – a young man who had been married for only 18 months and who joined the Army after the United States declared war on Iraq in 2003.

In a detailed, eloquent explanation of why he volunteered to go to Iraq, Mark wrote on a Web site that he felt compelled to do his part in trying to better a country plagued by interregional hatred and genocide.

"If you think the only way a person could bring themselves to volunteer for this war is through sheer desperation or blind obedience, then consider me the exception," he wrote.

"Don't forget that human beings have a responsibility to one another and that Americans will always have a responsibility to the oppressed," he added. "Don't overlook the obvious reasons to disagree with the war, but don't cheapen the moral aspects either."

Mark, a second lieutenant, recently had been reassigned to a riskier role in combat duty when an improvised explosive device killed him, relatives and the Department of Defense said Wednesday.

(Excerpt) Read more at ocregister.com ...

_______________________________________

2Lt Mark Daily's last blog posting at his MySpace site.
Sunday, October 29, 2006

Why I Joined:

This question has been asked of me so many times in so many different contexts that I thought it would be best if I wrote my reasons for joining the Army on my page for all to see. First, the more accurate question is why I volunteered to go to Iraq. After all, I joined the Army a week after we declared war on Saddam's government with the intention of going to Iraq. Now, after years of training and preparation, I am finally here.

Much has changed in the last three years. The criminal Ba'ath regime has been replaced by an insurgency fueled by Iraq's neighbors who hope to partition Iraq for their own ends. This is coupled with the ever present transnational militant Islamist movement which has seized upon Iraq as the greatest way to kill Americans, along with anyone else they happen to be standing near. What was once a paralyzed state of fear is now the staging ground for one of the largest transformations of power and ideology the Middle East has experienced since the collapse of the Ottoman Empire. Thanks to Iran, Syria, and other enlightened local actors, this transformation will be plagued by interregional hatred and genocide. And I am now in the center of this.
Is this why I joined?

Yes. Much has been said about America's intentions in overthrowing Saddam Hussein and seeking to establish a new state based upon political representation and individual rights. Many have framed the paradigm through which they view the conflict around one-word explanations such as "oil" or "terrorism," favoring the one which best serves their political persuasion. I did the same thing, and anyone who knew me before I joined knows that I am quite aware and at times sympathetic to the arguments against the war in Iraq. If you think the only way a person could bring themselves to volunteer for this war is through sheer desperation or blind obedience then consider me the exception (though there are countless like me).

I joined the fight because it occurred to me that many modern day "humanists" who claim to possess a genuine concern for human beings throughout the world are in fact quite content to allow their fellow "global citizens" to suffer under the most hideous state apparatuses and conditions. Their excuses used to be my excuses.

When asked why we shouldn't confront the Ba'ath party, the Taliban or the various other tyrannies throughout this world, my answers would allude to vague notions of cultural tolerance (forcing women to wear a veil and stay indoors is such a quaint cultural tradition), the sanctity of national sovereignty (how eager we internationalists are to throw up borders to defend dictatorships!) or even a creeping suspicion of America's intentions. When all else failed, I would retreat to my fragile moral ecosystem that years of living in peace and liberty had provided me. I would write off war because civilian casualties were guaranteed, or temporary alliances with illiberal forces would be made, or tank fuel was toxic for the environment.

My fellow "humanists" and I would relish contently in our self righteous declaration of opposition against all military campaigns against dictatorships, congratulating one another for refusing to taint that aforementioned fragile moral ecosystem that many still cradle with all the revolutionary tenacity of the members of Rage Against the Machine and Greenday. Others would point to America's historical support of Saddam Hussein, sighting it as hypocritical that we would now vilify him as a thug and a tyrant. Upon explaining that we did so to ward off the fiercely Islamist Iran, which was correctly identified as the greater threat at the time, eyes are rolled and hypocrisy is declared. Forgetting that America sided with Stalin to defeat Hitler, who was promptly confronted once the Nazis were destroyed, America's initial engagement with Saddam and other regional actors is identified as the ultimate argument against America's moral crusade.

And maybe it is. Maybe the reality of politics makes all political action inherently crude and immoral. Or maybe it is these adventures in philosophical masturbation that prevent people from ever taking any kind of effective action against men like Saddam Hussein. One thing is for certain, as disagreeable or as confusing as my decision to enter the fray may be, consider what peace vigils against genocide have accomplished lately. Consider that there are 19 year old soldiers from the Midwest who have never touched a college campus or a protest who have done more to uphold the universal legitimacy of representative government and individual rights by placing themselves between Iraqi voting lines and homicidal religious fanatics. Often times it is less about how clean your actions are and more about how pure your intentions are.

So that is why I joined. In the time it took for you to read this explanation, innocent people your age have suffered under the crushing misery of tyranny. Every tool of philosophical advancement and communication that we use to develop our opinions about this war are denied to countless human beings on this planet, many of whom live under the regimes that have, in my opinion, been legitimately targeted for destruction. Some have allowed their resentment of the President to stir silent applause for setbacks in Iraq. Others have ironically decried the war because it has tied up our forces and prevented them from confronting criminal regimes in Sudan, Uganda, and elsewhere.

I simply decided that the time for candid discussions of the oppressed was over, and I joined.
In digesting this posting, please remember that America's commitment to overthrow Saddam Hussein and his sons existed before the current administration and would exist into our future children's lives had we not acted. Please remember that the problems that plague Iraq today were set in motion centuries ago and were up until now held back by the most cruel of cages. Don't forget that human beings have a responsibility to one another and that Americans will always have a responsibility to the oppressed. Don't overlook the obvious reasons to disagree with the war but don't cheapen the moral aspects either. Assisting a formerly oppressed population in converting their torn society into a plural, democratic one is dangerous and difficult business, especially when being attacked and sabotaged from literally every direction. So if you have anything to say to me at the end of this reading, let it at least include "Good Luck"
Mark Daily

Wednesday, January 17, 2007

Never a good sign when Chairman Leahy is happy.

And boy is he happy about the Administration's latest move to halt any warrantless wiretapping. We will probably regret this -- deeply -- in the years to come.

The buffoons in Congress, particularly folks like "Leaky Leahy" are hell-bent on micromanaging every aspect of intelligence. It is a foolhardy, dangerous, regrettable move.

From Chairman Leahy:"I welcome the President's decision not to reauthorize the NSA's warrantless spying program and instead to seek approval for all wiretaps from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, as the law has required for years.
"Since this program was first revealed, I have urged this Administration to inform Congress what the government is doing and to comply with the checks and balances Congress wrote into law in the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.
"We must engage in all surveillance necessary to prevent acts of terrorism, but we can and should do so in ways that protect the basic rights of all Americans including the right to privacy. The issue has never been whether to monitor suspected terrorists but doing it legally and with proper checks and balances to prevent abuses.
"Providing efficient but meaningful court review is a major step toward addressing those concerns.
"I continue to urge the President to fully inform Congress and the American people about the contours of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court order authorizing this surveillance program, and of the program itself. Only with meaningful oversight can we ensure the balance necessary to achieve security with liberty."

Where is Jack Bauer?

No doubt the Season Premiere of "24" left fans breathless and liberals horrified. Sad state of affairs when a fictional television show does a better job of educating the public on the realities of terrorism than the news media.

Probably to the horror of many of the actors on the show, we conservatives embrace "24" as the well-written cautionary tale that it is, wistfully hoping that there are a fleet of Jack Bauers somewhere in the catacombs of the government's intelligence bureaucracy who are doing those things distasteful but necessary to keep us safe. Please Lord, let that be the case.

Meanwhile, like a Sandra Palmer gone mad, the left is crying foul over the emerging storyline this season -- extremist Jihadi Muslim terrorists armed with five suitcase nukes and an itchy trigger finger.

Bauer, understandably worn out from two years as a guest torture victim of communist China, is pulled back in to save the day once again as he views the Valencia, CA, nuclear attack helplessly. The horrified look on his face is one that many of us recognize as distantly familiar.....something we have seen before.....oh, that's right. We saw that horror on face after face on September 11th.

Can't happen here, liberals? Think again, comrades. It can and we have been blessed that it hasn't thusfar.

Ben Shapiro has an interesting column on Jack Bauer, etc. here. As usual, he provides an excellent analysis.

But if you'd really like to know where Jack Bauer is -- he is long since deceased. He died with demise of the O.S.S. after WWII and the birth of the C.I.A. The Church Commission danced on Bauer's grave in the 70's, insuring that any future Jack Bauers would be handcuffed, stifled and sued out of existence.

Those who naively believe that the unthinkable cannot happen and have little to no understanding of the nature of effective intelligence are whistling past a graveyard, apparently determined to put us all in one.

Thursday, January 11, 2007

Interesting maps....

http://robotwisdom.com/issues/religmaps.html

Soaring numbers of sex scarred young women flood campus health services.....sad, sad result of feminism gone awry.

http://www.townhall.com/columnists/JaniceShawCrouse/
2007/01/10/sex_and_consequences


This column should be required reading for all young women on college campuses. Actually, given how reckless some seem to be in high school, college may be too late!

The bill of goods sold to young women today by feminists who insist that equality can be found through a bedroom door (while neglecting to mention the consequences that feminist organizations GREATLY profit from) is not to be underestimated.

The plain facts don't seem to be discussed much -- that a woman's real source of power can be found in saying 'no' and maintaining self-respect.....and that biology will always trump the eternal feminist quest for "equality." Never did have much use for the notion of sinking to the level of equality, frankly. (Heresy! Scream the feminists!)

Tuesday, January 09, 2007

For the love of God, will SOMEONE in the WH or Pentagon listen to Michael Ledeen????

January 9, 2007 7:00 AM
The Surge and its CriticsGetting Syrious.By Michael Ledeen
We’ve renewed the great debate on Iraq, and as usual the central issue — the regional nature of the war — is not addressed. Still, one is grateful to Eliot Cohen and Bing West for some long-needed suggestions in their excellent article in the Wall Street Journal. Above all, they raise the question of “Iraqi justice,” one of the central requirements if the Iraqi people are going to have any confidence in the future.
http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=ZTYxZDcxMzkzNzhiMzFkNTAwMzkxNjE0Y2FkNmM0MTE=

Blowhard Kennedy

Stumbled into the National Press Club to bleat out his overstatement of the day, "Iraq is George Bush's Vietnam."

Shows how little Teddy paid attention to Vietnam if he thinks the casualties or the situation are even CLOSE to similar to Iraq.

Ted did everything he could to undermine our military and our efforts for years.....from Vietnam to the War on Terror, so what is another self-serving bloviating statement from that hubris-filled gasbag?

Monday, January 08, 2007

Cleaning up Bill Clinton's mess...

God bless our military in harm's way tonight and may their continuing mission be successful...

Breaking News from ABCNEWS.com:A U.S. AC-130 GUNSHIP CARRIED OUT A STRIKE AGAINST HIGH VALUE AL QAEDA TARGETS IN SOMALIA WHO WERE BELIEVED TO BE LINKED TO THE 1998 EMBASSY BOMBING
Shttp://abcnews.go.com?CMP=EMC-1396

Fred Fielding is one smart lawyer.....

BUSH PICKS REAGAN ATTORNEY AS HARRIET MIERS REPLACEMENT In a signal that he could be open to working more closely with congressional Democrats rather than stonewalling, President Bush plans to name the widely respected Republican lawyer Fred F. Fielding as WhiteHouse counsel this week, party sources tell TIME.Fielding, who held the same position under President Ronald Reagan, will succeed the President's friend Harriet Miers, who last week announced herresignation, effective Jan. 31. An official who has been briefed on the impending announcement, which could come as soon as Tuesday, calledFielding "the ultimate Washington lawyer-insider — he's the man to see."http://www.time.com/time/nation/
article/0,8599,1575066,00.html


Bush picks Fred Fielding as White House counselReuters - 27 minutes agoWASHINGTON (Reuters) - President George W. Bush has chosen Fred Fielding, who served as White House counsel during Ronald Reagan's presidency, ...White House Picks Counsel: Fred Fielding TPMmuckrakerFIELDING FOR HARRIET MIERS Free Market News NetworkWhite House Seeks Lawyer Wise to Ways of Congress New York Timesall 18 news articles

Thursday, January 04, 2007

Bill Clinton, cruisin' for the freshmen chicks in Congress....heh heh heh....

A target rich environment, according to Bill "Kiss It" Clinton:

http://apnews.myway.com/article/20070104/D8MEKM280.html

The homosexual rights movement

A fascinating piece:

The Truth About the Homosexual Rights Movement (Caution, graphic contents)
New Oxford Review ^ February 9, 2006 Ronald G. Lee

Pop some corn and watch the fun!

This day was nothing short of a parody on feminism. Not that I have ever understood the feminist beast, but here's what I got from today's Pelosi coronation.....

We apparently are supposed to celebrate Pelosi's coronation as some milestone of equality. As though sinking to equality is a desirable goal....but I digress. First black female to lead the Dept of State....is that a breakthrough? Nope. First black female judge on the DC Circuit Court of Appeals....is that a breakthrough? Nope. Only subjects of brutal lampooning and cartoons simply because they are, GASP, not Democrats, but Republicans....escapees off the liberal plantation.

We also are supposed to understand that Her Majesty Pelosi has some special insight, understanding and compassion because she has a uterus and sits rather than stands in the powder room.

We are supposed to believe Her Exaltedness Pelosi when she says that "progress rather than partisanship" will rule the day despite her promise to exclude any Republican (person or idea) from the first 100 hours of beehive activity and beyond.

We are also to nod vigorously to Her Perfectness Pelosi and her wonderful ethics package while turning a blind eye to those in her caucus who are the worst sort of ethics violators but nonetheless have earned her active and vigorous support.

We are to believe that Her Worshipfulness Pelosi is doing all of this "for the children". Those kids, I guess, who are lucky enough to escape the abortion holocaust and who are deemed worthy of life over convenience, disability or scientific experimentation needs. Those children are out of luck, I guess, in Her Highness' world.

Feminists spend an inordinate amount of time screeching at the world that there is no difference between men and women and anyone who recognizes that is apparently, a sexist pig. If there truly is no difference, as they claim, then why is it trumpeted from here to Beijing that a chick is the new Speaker? Frankly, I could care less if it is a man, woman or a Martian who holds the gavel so long as they are conservatives. Their genetic atributes make no difference whatsoever -- except to the liberals hell bent on separating us all by gender, race, class, religion and any other "groupthink" victimization gobbledygook they can externalize (read: blame) their failings on. Always easier to blame the external ghost of "hegemony" rather than find any internal defects via careful reflection and self-assessment.

Unfortunately, this San Francisco liberal the loons in Congress elected Speaker is one for the record books as an off-the-chart liberal who sports some rather bizarre, downright kooky ideas that this nation will not soon forget. Lots of us will be cheering for the Senate to stop the insanity with the sixty vote barrier or for the President to break out the veto pen with gusto....for the sake of the nation, children and all.

Ding dong, the Ayatollah is dead. Good news for the day.

According to the ever-brilliant Michael Ledeen.......Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Iran’s Supreme Leader, is dead.Pajamas Media ^ January 4, 2007

Wednesday, January 03, 2007

NOT a Ford fan.

Ford was a good and decent man as well as a devoted husband and father.

He was also a horrible President.

He pardoned the draft dodgers, pardoned Nixon on the eve of the disastrous November 74 midterm elections, coddled the Russians, selected ideological soulmate Nelson Rockefeller as his VP, supported racial quotas, endorsed the Equal Rights Amendment, refused to support the huge tax cuts advocated by supply-siders, and, worst of all, he gave us 32 years of votes cast by John Paul Stevens. Since leaving office, he has been a crusader for expanding abortion and homosexuality.

Which part of that legacy should we honor or celebrate?

It is for good reason that the modest turnout for the Ford events will be dwarfed by the extraordinary turnout for our beloved Gipper in 2004. I shed one thousand tears for Ronald Wilson Reagan (and still do whenever I catch a video clip of one of his speeches). When I watched the incessant Ford clips this week, my contempt for the man's politics dispossessed me of any capacity to become teary eyed. Indeed, it is the millions of victims of Ford's legacy whom we should mourn.

And there is no doubt that Betty Ford loved her husband and has suffered the loss of a lifetime when her husband passed on.

But Betty Ford also ushered in the Oprah era where everyone's maladies, abuse histories and complete lack of privacy are put on public display for the world to collapse in hysterical tears over. For the love of God, strength used to be shown by a lady's ability to act like a lady no matter the difficulty of the circumstance or the effect of the past. Now, apparently strength is found in how rough one's life was and in how outrageous one can be in recounting every sordid detail. Ugh.

Never will I forget my mother, outraged at Betty Ford's support of the ERA then parading every malady or problem she faced for the world to review and comment on. Before that, it simply was not done. It was considered gauche.

Frankly, feminists have so confused where a woman's strength truly lies that it is all but a faint memory for the current generation of terribly confused young ladies.

I respect the private grief that the Ford family is suffering through, but make no mistake....there has not been a day that this conservative has mourned the liberal policies and proclivities of the Ford Administration.